4 ms·
Signing posts with a hash tied to a thing that might prove you are human instead of a LLM astroturfing might actually be a good value proposition for blockchain
by mgiampapa 1y ago
Signing posts with a hash tied to a thing that might prove you are human instead of a LLM astroturfing might actually be a good value proposition for blockchain.
- 52-6F-62 1y agoMy body does that for me…
- mgiampapa 1y agoNope, this is the internet. I know you are a cat in a tube. The internet is full of them, like dump trucks.
- 52-6F-62 1y agoHN is dead
- GeoAtreides 1y agoseptember is the cruelest month
- Henchman21 1y agoIt’s so much longer than the other months!
- ssabev 1y agoCame here to agree. Initially I thought it's a bloody stupid idea, however at this stage I reckon we need it or a lot of boomers are going to be ones hotted into singing away all their wealth away.
- Henchman21 1y agoAaah, now you see the plan clearly.
- treyd 1y agoYou don't need a blockchain for that, just cryptographic signatures and PKI. The EU is implementing a system for national IDs that would enable this, and could be done with perfect privacy through zero-knowledge proofs.
- mgiampapa 1y agoThat doesn't really scale to the 3rd world as a form of identity validation. I'm sure there is more than one way to do it, I'm just saying it's a way to do it.
- tlb 1y agoYes, if every government was reliably incorruptible, they could also work together to build a global human verification network. I predict that Worldcoin will get it done first, and will be more dependable than most countries. But it could turn out otherwise. In the end, services that need humanity verification will have multiple provider options and the market will decide.
- sigmaisaletter 1y agoWorldcoin is and always will be opt-in. Government solutions will be opt-out, and only in the most tedious way: Leaving the country, burning your passport and becoming a stateless person. Not recommended. If there ever was a moat, government has it.
- jazzyjackson 1y agoWhy would I trust the entry on the blockchain? I'd rather just trust the government body issuing my ID. Estonia has had it for years, it's amazing that here in USA people send contracts over email and just click a button to "sign" it - Adobe at least allows actual PKI signatures but there's not really a registry to verify it against so useless in most cases. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Estonian_identity_card https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Estonian_identity_card
- mgiampapa 1y agoYeah, the US is a backwards economy and clearly isn't successful with all it's rules and that silly Bill Clinton era digital signature law isn't pulling it's weight. It's been solidly eclipsed by Estonian technical superiority. I would trust a blockchain more than my government. My government has clearly been shown to be vulnerable to a < 51% attack. Blockchains don't change every 4 years and decide habeas corpus no longer applies to me because my skin is the wrong color either.