> The harm is to the agency of the owners The status quo of discrimination caused harm to the agency of minority employees and shoppers. Why are "owners" more

> The harm is to the agency of the owners The status quo of discrimination caused harm to the agency of minority employees and shoppers. Why are "owners" more important than them? > There is no harm to a grocery owner... except economic self-harm So then there is harm. Economic harm is kinda the important kind of harm to a business owner. Every other "harm" is surmountable. > Or the customers can move out to the countryside, a suburb, or a small town where they can only find white grocers So what's the problem? They've added transaction costs for themselves to express their preferences.