4 ms·
It's basically impossible. The sites that manage to be strict enough just end up with bots which are real phones in a building somewhere. You just have to desi
by nitwit005 1y ago
It's basically impossible. The sites that manage to be strict enough just end up with bots which are real phones in a building somewhere.
You just have to design so the bot's aren't relevant. The problem with Twitter, Facebook, and friends, is that they push the bot content at you, even if you don't follow them.
- nextn 1y ago> It's basically impossible. Require a fee to post.
- RandomBacon 1y agoThen you just get bots that support scams or overpriced garbage and can afford the posting fee.
- nextn 1y agoIt's a question of price. No bot can afford a fee that increases exponentially based on the number of views. Similar to quadratic voting https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadratic_voting https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadratic_voting
- nitwit005 1y agoThe reason people suggested that for emails, is because you have to send a large number of times to spam. With social media, that's not true. A single post can be viewed a large number of times.
- nextn 1y agoUse quadratic post fees. The larger the number of people who try to view a post, the larger the fee becomes or the post stops being viewable. So the fee isn't a one-time fee, but an "open" fee that keeps increasing. Another mechanism is to require a fee to view. If after viewing the content the user deems the content isn't valuable, they flag it in some way or they don't bookmark it, and this indicates the poster should pay the display fee.
- chairmansteve 1y agoYes. It's the algorithms.