> it's not a "fringe legal theory" 1. It is a legal theory "judicial theory". -- your source 2. Fringe "federal courts have increasingly limited how and whe

> it's not a "fringe legal theory" 1. It is a legal theory "judicial theory". -- your source 2. Fringe "federal courts have increasingly limited how and when plaintiffs may file disparate-impact claims. As a result, disparate-impact suits have become less successful over time." Also your source. 3. Off topic a) The research I cited was not about fringe legal theories but about reality in the world. b) I am not interested in your hypotheticals that have nothing to do with that research, nothing to do with the publishing bias against research showing no bias against women or bias against men, and probably also nothing to do with the actual legal theory of disparate impact.