3 ms·

edit: Whoops

• __loam 1y ago
  Awesome analysis dude! I'm sure the judge will love that when discord sues these guys.
  • DaSHacka 1y ago
    He said _ethical_, not _legal_. Would you agree abusive ToS's by massive corpos are unethical? What about the Disney+ ToS hiding a binding arbitration agreement preventing you from suing them? [0]. Or are you one of those "my personal ethics are whatever the law says" folk? [0] https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/disney-says-man-cant-sue-wifes-death-agreed-disney-terms-service-rcna166594 https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/disney-says-man-cant-su...
    • __loam 1y ago
      The last guy who scraped discord like this was a freak who also got sued to hell by them.
      • DaSHacka 1y ago
        The difference is they ran a private service to profit off the scraped data, and explicitly marketed it as a "dox-for-hire" service, so ethically I think the situations are quite different (the researchers explitly took steps to censor usernames in this dataset)