While that's a valid point of view, as long as the human is the bottleneck, it's not going to scale to infinity and beyond. Human's got to exist and needs to w

While that's a valid point of view, as long as the human is the bottleneck, it's not going to scale to infinity and beyond. Human's got to exist and needs to work to eat. They don't really, necessarily, existentially need to be 10x productive with the help of AI. But I'll be honest, that's not really a solid argument, because it could rapidly lead to the question of why they do this exact job in the first place, instead of e.g. farming or whatever else there might be that can be called a net positive for humanity without reservations.