3 ms·
So, to achieve parity, they should allow humans to also commit code without checking that it at least compiles, right? Or MS already does that?
by nottorp 1y ago
So, to achieve parity, they should allow humans to also commit code without checking that it at least compiles, right?
Or MS already does that?
- codyvoda 1y agothe code goes through a PR review process like any other? what are you talking about?
- fernandotakai 1y agoi don't know about you, but i would never EVER submit a PR that fails to compile. not tests are failing, those happen (specially flaky ci), but not compiling. that's literally the bare minimum.
- codyvoda 1y agoand you think this beta system that launched like 2 days ago can’t achieve that? it also opens the PR as its working session. there are a lot of dials, and a lot of redditor-ass opinions from people who don’t use or understand the tech
- nottorp 1y agowhat i see is a human telling the "AI" that the code does not compile what use is a bot if it can't do at least this simple step?
- codyvoda 1y agoit can do this step. once again, this launched 2 days ago and people are using it for the first time if you have used it for more than a few hours (or literally just read the docs) and aren’t stupid, you know this is easily solved you’re giving into mob mentality
- nottorp 1y agoSo everyone who doesn't worship "AI" is stupid? :)
- codyvoda 1y agois that what I said? if you can’t read documentation and follow basic instructions to get a tool to work you’re stupid. you asked a snarky question like it’s some gotcha. once again, if you actually use the tool and read the docs and can’t figure it out, I think it’s a skill issue
- nottorp 1y agoThe gotcha is you seem to consider it normal to push code that doesn't qualify even for "it works on my machine".
- nottorp 1y agoso do you consider normal to submit code that you have never compiled? or ran at least once if it's not a compiled language...