4 ms·

> but the consequences are the opposite of supporting the diversity and abundance in arts. I made 5 songs about 5 different people in a week, with carefully cr

> but the consequences are the opposite of supporting the diversity and abundance in arts. I made 5 songs about 5 different people in a week, with carefully crafted lyrics and tones described by me in the custom prompt, that led to 10 mp3 files of songs (suno generates 2 songs per prompt) Those songs are out there, it’s different, it’s not sloppy it’s actually quite enjoyable. Now there is more diversity and abundance those songs wouldn’t have existed without AI and there are millions doing it like me out there, those artists who produce songs also have same tools as me, they can be better than me, faster, better, more albums now made by them, edit stuff to perfection, ideate and iterate faster. Who is stopping them ? Tell me this song is trash and slop : https://suno.com/song/c36741d6-ec62-4922-86f9-6fd0b6f37497 https://suno.com/song/c36741d6-ec62-4922-86f9-6fd0b6f37497 This is in replacement of me and my friends listening to their same 20-40 artists who would be in billboards list each month. Tell me it has hurt the abundance and diversity of songs out there, that it stopped someone from making their own thing or others listening to their songs, I listen to that song, it’s made by someone else with AI, I don’t mind, it’s awesome !

ZoomZoomZoom 1y ago
What that service generates for you is content, it's not art. I don't understand how you can mix one for the other. The only artistic creative process happening is you making a prompt and reiterating. You're free to disagree, but I posit it's not nearly enough to qualify. > Tell me this song is trash and slop As you wish. What I argue is not about "diversity of songs", but that's this "AI" revolution strives to further the process of replacing the arts with commodity substitutes. It will be sleek, shiny, comforting, friendly and, possibly, enjoyable, but it's almost worthless in itself.
huimang 1y ago
You didn't make anything, aside from whatever lyrics, if any, you wrote yourself. The song is adequate. The beat, drop, and chords are not that complicated, you could've learned how to do that yourself and not be chained to suno or whatever. I would be delighted if a friend took the time to personally write and produce a song about me. I would not care at all if I realized it was just auto-generated stuff being pumped out "5x per week". The former I would cherish, the latter would be disposable junk to be listened to once and then forgotten about. It's slop because it doesn't mean anything or has any value, not because it's literally sloppy. --- "listening to their same 20-40 artists who would be in billboards list each month" That's a you problem, quite literally a skill issue. There are so many indie artists making wonderful music that's leagues better than whatever hyper-distilled swill is on the radio at the moment. --- "tell me it has hurt the abundance and diversity of songs out there" Actual artists who make music composition and production their career ARE hurt when they can't find jobs/gigs/commissions because of things like suno. These tools are predicated on wholesale theft of music produced by humans. But you can generate disposable songs at breakneck pace that don't mean anything, so it doesn't matter.
sensanaty 1y ago
I'm sorry but that song you posted is the most generic, bland garbage that imitates the literally millions of other pop songs they stole in their training sets. It sounds like Charlie xcx without any of the actual creativity, and the actual track itself you could learn how to make yourself with FL Studio in about half an hour following one of the many tutorials out there.
- teitoklien 1y ago
  if a song style gets imitated a million times that speaks to how good a particular track is, people dont imitate trash. Also it took me 30 seconds to generate it, instead of 7 days of learning and debugging sound studio tools (which i dont have time for, i need to work daily too) So No, you’re only speaking from emotions, not from a place of reality.

ZoomZoomZoom 1y ago

What that service generates for you is content, it's not art. I don't understand how you can mix one for the other. The only artistic creative process happening is you making a prompt and reiterating. You're free to disagree, but I posit it's not nearly enough to qualify. > Tell me this song is trash and slop As you wish. What I argue is not about "diversity of songs", but that's this "AI" revolution strives to further the process of replacing the arts with commodity substitutes. It will be sleek, shiny, comforting, friendly and, possibly, enjoyable, but it's almost worthless in itself.

huimang 1y ago

You didn't make anything, aside from whatever lyrics, if any, you wrote yourself. The song is adequate. The beat, drop, and chords are not that complicated, you could've learned how to do that yourself and not be chained to suno or whatever. I would be delighted if a friend took the time to personally write and produce a song about me. I would not care at all if I realized it was just auto-generated stuff being pumped out "5x per week". The former I would cherish, the latter would be disposable junk to be listened to once and then forgotten about. It's slop because it doesn't mean anything or has any value, not because it's literally sloppy. --- "listening to their same 20-40 artists who would be in billboards list each month" That's a you problem, quite literally a skill issue. There are so many indie artists making wonderful music that's leagues better than whatever hyper-distilled swill is on the radio at the moment. --- "tell me it has hurt the abundance and diversity of songs out there" Actual artists who make music composition and production their career ARE hurt when they can't find jobs/gigs/commissions because of things like suno. These tools are predicated on wholesale theft of music produced by humans. But you can generate disposable songs at breakneck pace that don't mean anything, so it doesn't matter.

sensanaty 1y ago

I'm sorry but that song you posted is the most generic, bland garbage that imitates the literally millions of other pop songs they stole in their training sets. It sounds like Charlie xcx without any of the actual creativity, and the actual track itself you could learn how to make yourself with FL Studio in about half an hour following one of the many tutorials out there.

teitoklien 1y ago
if a song style gets imitated a million times that speaks to how good a particular track is, people dont imitate trash. Also it took me 30 seconds to generate it, instead of 7 days of learning and debugging sound studio tools (which i dont have time for, i need to work daily too) So No, you’re only speaking from emotions, not from a place of reality.