3 ms·
I used to work at Vanguard, which has significantly more assets under management than Coinbase. Vanguard had special categories for people with a lot of assets,
by ecshafer 1y ago
I used to work at Vanguard, which has significantly more assets under management than Coinbase. Vanguard had special categories for people with a lot of assets, high net worth, ultra-high net worth, etc for people that had over $10M and $100M (iirc) in assets under management at Vanguard. Because its a traditional finance company all of the client information was stored (name, phone, address, email, etc). Now it was basically impossible for any employee to get access to this information without needing it. Even working in the tech side I could not just log into the DB and run a query for people's information, make trades, etc. Everything was logged, everything was tracked, and access was very specifically restricted to limit issues.
My point here is that Coinbase (blaming this on a "overseas" employee) and the TechCrunch founder are missing that traditional finance companies have already solved these issues. They are just immature and not serious companies.
- hoppp 1y agoYes because crypto exchanges born out of the wild west like conditions don't want to actually do any KYC. So they do some whacky solutions.
- rchaud 1y ago> They are just immature and not serious companies. Every company running on "Founder Mode" where the founder is banking on weak regulations and low competition instead of a solid product with customer safety guardrails will end up this way.
- throwaway290 1y agobasically the entire space of so called AI:)
- aitchnyu 1y agoIs there a pattern for encrypting email, name, phone fields so db leak wont be valuable? Of course we should be able to login, send marketing emails etc.