>If AI kills us all, it's going to be through the most boring and mundane way possible, because boring and mundane is how you get people to not care and not fig

>If AI kills us all, it's going to be through the most boring and mundane way possible, because boring and mundane is how you get people to not care and not fight back. Human disempowerment is a different thing vs extinction I'd argue. Anyway the boring human extinction scenarios we come up with probably just aren't close to what might actually happen but our lack of imagination doesn't make use safe. >[0] I am not convinced that a mirror virus would actually be able to successfully infect and reproduce in non-mirror cells. The whole idea of mirror life is that the mirrored chemistry doesn't interact with ours. Whether this or any other scenario humans come up with are actually feasible is completely irrelevant to the doom argument. People however hyperfocus on these things like why an ASI couldn't possibly build Nanobots or whatever they fixate on and it's just irrelevant to the core argument.