4 ms·
Actors will license their appearance, voice, and mannerisms to these new media projects. (Maybe by established Hollywood studios, maybe not). Then the first fu
by quesera 1y ago
Actors will license their appearance, voice, and mannerisms to these new media projects. (Maybe by established Hollywood studios, maybe not).
Then the first fully non-human (but human-like) actors will be created and gain popularity. The IP of those characters will be more valuable than the humans they replaced. They will be derided by old people as "Mickey Mouse" AI actors. The SAG will be beside themselves. Younger people will not care. The characters will never get old (or they will be perfectly rendered when they need to be old).
The off-screen dramas and controversies are part of the entertainment, and these will be manufactured too. (If there will even be an off-screen...)
This is the future, and we've been preparing for it for years by presenting the most fake versions of ourselves on social media. Viewers have zero expectation of authenticity, so biological status is just one more detail.
It will be perfect, and it will be awful. Kids born five years from now will never know anything different.
- FirmwareBurner 1y ago>Actors will license their appearance, voice, and mannerisms to these new media projects Very few actors have an appearance or a voice worth a lot in licenses. That's like the top 1% of actors, if that. I think if done right, humans could also end up getting emotionally attached to 100% AI generated characters, not just famous celebrities.
- quesera 1y agoSure, but I'd bet that 1% of actors (of the total pool of SAG on-screen talent membership?) comprise 75%+ of branding/name recognition for consumers. So the appearance licenses for these 1% are valuable in Stage 1 of the takeover. The rest are just forgotten collateral damage. Hollywood is full of 'em.