3 ms·
From the Macworld article of the same day it was pretty clear that you needed to be part of the Apple developer program: http://www.macworld.com/article/116540
by huxley 14y ago
From the Macworld article of the same day it was pretty clear that you needed to be part of the Apple developer program:
http://www.macworld.com/article/1165408/mountain_lion_hands_on_with_gatekeeper.html http://www.macworld.com/article/1165408/mountain_lion_hands_...
The Ars Technica article also is pretty clear:
http://arstechnica.com/apple/2012/02/developers-gatekeeper-a-concern-but-still-gives-power-users-control/ http://arstechnica.com/apple/2012/02/developers-gatekeeper-a...
If there is confusion it may have been from reading more into what Gruber wrote than was actually there.
The Gatekeeper certificates are free to registered developers, but I don't Apple ever suggested that you didn't have to be part of the Apple Developer Program.
- quonn 14y agoThey did suggest it and I understood it like that as well.
- makomk 14y agoGruber explicitly stated that it was "free-of-charge" full stop, and a lot of people at the time chose to believe him over the information on the Apple website that said paid membership in the Apple developer program was required and the other reports correctly saying the same thing.