I agree. LLM's can make convincing arguments for almost anything. For something like this, what would be more useful is having it go through all of them indiv

I agree. LLM's can make convincing arguments for almost anything. For something like this, what would be more useful is having it go through all of them individually and generate a _brief_ report about whether and how the resume matches the job description, along with an short argument both _for_ and _against_ advancing the resume, and then let a real recruiter flip through those and make the decision. One advantage that LLM's have over recruiters, especially for technical stuff is that they "know" what all the jargon means the relationships between various technologies and skill sets, so they can call out stuff that a simple keyword search might miss. Really, if you spend any time thinking about it, you can probably think of 100 ways that you can usefully apply LLMs to recruiting that don't involve "making decisions".