3 ms·
Seriously? The discussion is about language features, not optimal algorithms. One could imagine the question was actually "sum BusyBeaver(n) for n divisible by
by dbaupp 14y ago
Seriously? The discussion is about language features, not optimal algorithms.
One could imagine the question was actually "sum BusyBeaver(n) for n divisible by 3 and 5 between 1 and 100", i.e. no closed form. In Python:
sum(BusyBeaver(x) for x in xrange(1,101) if x % 3 == 0 and x % 5 == 0)
(And yes, if one was being really pedantic, one could replace the condition with x % 15 == 0.)
- darkestkhan 14y agoThe thing is that people start using those libraries w/o thinking before - and theirs' solutions end up doing much more work than is needed
- delinka 14y agoThis could be said of most anything high level.