3 ms·
I try to do as much as possible in a (dagger) script and use the GHA to call it. That way I can test the script locally. I wonder if there is a proposal to sup
by esafak 1y ago
I try to do as much as possible in a (dagger) script and use the GHA to call it. That way I can test the script locally.
I wonder if there is a proposal to support code-based actions. Config-based CI needs to die.
- spion 1y agoWhy dagger and not just... any language? (Nushell for example https://www.nushell.sh/ https://www.nushell.sh/)
- esafak 1y agoBecause I'm typically building and running tests in containers in CI, which is what dagger is for. nu is my default shell. Note that I am not talking about dagger shell. https://dagger.io/blog/a-shell-for-the-container-age-introducing-dagger-shell https://dagger.io/blog/a-shell-for-the-container-age-introdu...
- mikepurvis 1y agoYup. Every time there's one of these threads I renew my call for GHA to have hooks where in-band build tools like nix, bazel, dagger, and friends can propagate upward optimal information to be displayed in the web gui, in particular annotations and info about multiple tasks that run in parallel or series.