The article pushes against that kind of solution: > But we should always be suspicious of complex, multi-factorial explanations for trend breaks on a chart. Th

The article pushes against that kind of solution: > But we should always be suspicious of complex, multi-factorial explanations for trend breaks on a chart. That wage stagnation started and ended suddenly enough that it cries out for a simple story. We just don’t have one yet. Although I don't really understand that at all. It seems like simple singular solutions should be the ones we're suspicious of.