4 ms·
If you read the article, it's pretty clear that it's referring to St. Louis. While I agree that it should have spelled it out in the title, I don't think it's u
by mkopinsky 14y ago
If you read the article, it's pretty clear that it's referring to St. Louis. While I agree that it should have spelled it out in the title, I don't think it's unreasonable to expect people to click through and RTFA.
- heretoo 14y ago> RTFA It's not spelt out whether your intent here is to berate the guy or not, but I get the distinct impression that it is. Your response is rude and uncalled for. I read the article and it's not clear to me that STL is supposed to be equivalent to St Louis, because it isn't spelt out, and furthermore, I don't intend on looking it up in a dictionary of acronyms referring to foreign places that I may never visit, without first knowing that STL refers to a place.
- shocks 14y agoNo. It's not "pretty clear". I read the article and I had no idea. But then, if you'd have RTFA then perhaps you would have known that too?
- cantankerous 14y agoThe third paragraph mentions St. Louis in an unabbreviated form. I picked it up almost right away.