4 ms·
Yes but if your facts are found to be wrong regarding elements of a crime you could lose everything and spend the rest of your life in an impossible to crawl ou
by ty6853 1y ago
Yes but if your facts are found to be wrong regarding elements of a crime you could lose everything and spend the rest of your life in an impossible to crawl out of financial hole (see Alex Jones or Ammon Bundy).
Therefore when discussing facts regarding a crime it is best to be vague rather than state it objectively.
- cosmicgadget 1y agoSeems like it's a reason to verify facts and qualify them when you can't. Luckily for Jones and Bundy, any misreported information was immaterial to their guilt/liability.
- ty6853 1y agoI think that was the point of this particular thread, that we don't appear to have any real confidence wired.com could verify this was Luigi's gun. >any misreported information was immaterial to their guilt/liability. In both cases they lost everything because it was found they misreported the facts of a crime or alleged crimes.
- cosmicgadget 1y ago"Misreported" is certainly one way to phrase it.