> "Harm" is a very subjective, one-sided view of a government efficiency and anti-corruption project. I don't think it's an efficiency or anti-corruption proje

> "Harm" is a very subjective, one-sided view of a government efficiency and anti-corruption project. I don't think it's an efficiency or anti-corruption project. If it is, it has failed pretty solidly. In the meantime, it's actively and objectively harming real people. Regardless of whether or not you agree, the opposition to Musk doesn't appear to be overly tribal in nature. It appears to be a reaction to harm (real or perceived).