3 ms·
oh ty ty that does make much more sense than my absurd simplification (note that they owned the parking, so its moot if they parked on a reserved spot on priva
by tough 1y ago
oh ty ty that does make much more sense than my absurd simplification
(note that they owned the parking, so its moot if they parked on a reserved spot on private property of theirs)
I guess not being localizable by press/random people is a nice plus if you can afford.
but didnt he buy always the same model?
- nerdsniper 1y agoYou were actually right. See sibling comment to yours.
- tough 1y agoYes, I didnt remember but that's probably the article I had read years ago and was thinking about! I guess we both where right at different points in time ;)
- FireBeyond 1y ago> note that they owned the parking, so its moot if they parked on a reserved spot on private property of theirs Eh, pedantry, but you'll find that building and occupation codes dictate a certain number of disabled parking spots. You could argue that a spot that is ostensibly this, but "everyone knows" is Steve Jobs' spot, is not a disabled parking spot. (But yes, odds of the City of Cupertino taking any issue with this whatsoever are entirely zero.)