Interesting, so in your experience Gemini 2.5 Pro bests Claude 3.7 ? I didn’t pay much attention to it, will give it a go, thanks for the reference! Again, I t

Interesting, so in your experience Gemini 2.5 Pro bests Claude 3.7 ? I didn’t pay much attention to it, will give it a go, thanks for the reference! Again, I think of the task I mentioned as not easy (it’s a lot of code) but it is simple (it’s a very boring for me code that I know how to write). Caveat: (and I realized this throughout our exchange) is that the definition of “simple” differs a lot depending on the person and the field they are in vs. the domain of the task. In part the task was “simple” by my standard is I have three decades of experience in the field, and the task is within my domain (networking protocols). 3500 LoC was what LLM generated, I will need to refactor and probably reduce that. What you describe in my view would be probably “ complicated” (will require a lot of knowledge I don’t have) & “not easy” (it is lots of code) - I can imagine the data model is probably not trivial, plus you have to think a lot about potential extension points, future data migrations, etc) Collaborative planning is an interesting new use, I will try it out, thanks for sharing! FWIW, this past week I wrote up my uses of LLM (Claude 3.7) and published them, for a longer form experience than my comments here). http://stdio.be/blog/2025-05-18-How-I-use-LLMs/ http://stdio.be/blog/2025-05-18-How-I-use-LLMs/ Your comment that you have to explain very well to it what you want is in part what I wanted to convey - LLM is an amplifier/executor, rather than a creative generator. The initiative is still fully yours.