> But that would require the protocol to also have the ability to set friendly names against public addresses. Which it doesn’t, and changing it to do so is no

> But that would require the protocol to also have the ability to set friendly names against public addresses. Which it doesn’t, and changing it to do so is not a realistic option. If we’re dreaming up anything, then my suggestion would instead be for no one to be dishonest, or for everyone’s basic needs to be met so they don’t need money and to speculate on cryptocurrencies. I’m pretty confident either of those would happen before every way people routinely get swindled off their cryptocurrencies is solved.