3 ms·
> Of course I did not only mention the CCP as a nefarious actor in the 'social' landscape, did you miss that? No, of course not, and it feels like quite unfrie
by AlecSchueler 1y ago
> Of course I did not only mention the CCP as a nefarious actor in the 'social' landscape, did you miss that?
No, of course not, and it feels like quite unfriendly rhetoric to suggest that I could have done just because I responded to a particular aspect of your position.
But now that we've dropped the pretense I can comfortably say that your opening paragraph comes across as insane; paranoid and in denial of science and composed in a way that strikes as if you just tried to shoe-horn in as many of your pet concerns as possible.
- hagbard_c 1y agoCould you explain what about my opening paragraph comes across as 'insane' and 'paranoid'? Are there inaccuracies which cause concern for you and if so could you point them out? As far as I see there are no such problems but if you can point them out I may change my mind. If you can not, well, in that case I can only conclude that this ad-hominem attack is the result of you not being able to debate the facts and as such feel like you have to resort to 'comfortably' defaming the character of the debater.