> In person testing is a solution for most issues, but not all. First off, class time is precious. I shouldn't have to waste incredibly valuable instruction tim

> In person testing is a solution for most issues, but not all. First off, class time is precious. I shouldn't have to waste incredibly valuable instruction time doing the actual test. Have a final be worth 50% of a student's grade. Have very cheap by the hour proctors proctor the test. Even if it was just during class time, it's just one class. To ensure pretty fair grading, it seems a small price to pay. > Second, on-line classes are massive for many if not all schools. Requiring students to show up physically is both inconvenient, and (depending on which accrediting agency you are accredited by) not allowed. Mkay, make them come in one time. If it's online only, then... whelp you're out of luck. Although, I think the students were cheating mightily on online-only before AI. It is that simple, if what you're looking for is a fair grading framework.