2 ms·
There is already significant investment from AOM, Videolan, and FFMPEG funding the development of dav1d. Is there a reason that that investment is not relevant?
by degamad 1y ago
There is already significant investment from AOM, Videolan, and FFMPEG funding the development of dav1d. Is there a reason that that investment is not relevant?
From what I can tell, way more than $20k has been invested into dav1d, and that investment has generated many performance optimisations already. Ostensibly, that's what this rav1d bounty is competing with.
- bArray 1y ago> Is there a reason that that investment is not relevant? I wasn't aware of it, in that case this could be a more interesting comparison. > From what I can tell, way more than $20k has been invested into dav1d, and that investment has generated many performance optimisations already. Ostensibly, that's what this rav1d bounty is competing with. Was rav1d a port of dav1d or developed from scratch?