> That's a video games logic No, it’s science. There are about a million ways to protect your own troops if that’s actually what you want to do. It feels like

> That's a video games logic No, it’s science. There are about a million ways to protect your own troops if that’s actually what you want to do. It feels like you’re arguing against the idea of chemical weapons from the 1940s, rather than nearly a century later. You don’t need protective gear. You can create sprays, lotions, inhalants, and other countermeasures that don’t stop working the second a piece of cloth rips. Shit, You could make a biological agent that avoids a DNA marker created with an mRNA vaccine. Likely not nearly as fast, but perfectly lethal. Modern chemical weapons and biological weapons are absolutely incomparable to their Vietnam counterparts.