4 ms·
Again, it's NOT trillion frames per second. Stop spreading this bullshit. That camera takes extremely short exposures (1 trillionth of a sec), but it cannot ta
by rorrr 14y ago
Again, it's NOT trillion frames per second. Stop spreading this bullshit.
That camera takes extremely short exposures (1 trillionth of a sec), but it cannot take 1 trillion of such exposures in one second. Not even close. Not one billion, not one million (and probably not even one thousand, as there are only a few sensors that can do that).
- noselasd 14y agoThey capture data at about half a trillion "fps". Then they repeat this over and over and combine the data - as the light from just one exposure is too weak.
- rorrr 14y agoThis just shows you don't understand how their technology works. They don't capture the data at half a trillion FPS. They take very short exposures and shift the phase very precisely, which creates an illusion of 1 trillion fps.
- pubby 14y agoThe resulting video is one trillion frames per second which the title is referring to. This video shows 10,000 fps video camera which seems to be on a commercially sold camera: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tcQ37OfknJ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tcQ37OfknJ
- rorrr 14y ago> resulting video is one trillion frames per second No, the resulting video is 30 frames per second.