3 ms·

Whether it’s nonsense or not, this quote in the critical assessment is concerning: > If I were a science journalist writing an article about a supposedly shock

Whether it’s nonsense or not, this quote in the critical assessment is concerning: > If I were a science journalist writing an article about a supposedly shocking development like this, I would email some experts and check to see if it’s for real. An attitude like that would have us all believing the earth is flat or that the sun revolves around the earth. After all, experts of the time believed both wrongly.

discoinverno 1y ago
I agree with that comment. Experts can be wrong, of course, but the null hypothesis is that their opinion is 'more correct' than that of a science journalist. As an aside, nobody really believed the earth was flat: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myth_of_the_flat_Earth https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myth_of_the_flat_Earth.
- rubitxxx4 1y ago
  > nobody really believed the earth was flat Your link only debates that during the Middle Ages people thought the earth was flat. Those living in ancient Mesopotamia and Egypt believed we all lived on a flat disc or plane floating in the ocean.
darkerside 1y ago
I'd like to revise that comment to, "email the experts to better understand how this finding fits into the current scientific worldview." We shouldn't take the experts on blind faith, but we definitely shouldn't take the challenges on blind faith either.
michaelmrose 1y ago
It is true that revolutionary theories may be both true and controversial but they are rarely friendless or obviously wrong to nearly all practitioners of the relevant fields and those theories are legion and without merit. Without being up to date in the minutia of every field one will be ill disposed to judge which of 100 piles of nonsense extant at any given time are real discoveries and which bunkum and ones work as a journalist would be so compromised by the 1000 lies one spread that none should believe the one truth they uncovered. I wouldn't credit anyone so stupid as not to consult ones peers.

discoinverno 1y ago

I agree with that comment. Experts can be wrong, of course, but the null hypothesis is that their opinion is 'more correct' than that of a science journalist. As an aside, nobody really believed the earth was flat: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myth_of_the_flat_Earth https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myth_of_the_flat_Earth.

rubitxxx4 1y ago
> nobody really believed the earth was flat Your link only debates that during the Middle Ages people thought the earth was flat. Those living in ancient Mesopotamia and Egypt believed we all lived on a flat disc or plane floating in the ocean.

darkerside 1y ago

I'd like to revise that comment to, "email the experts to better understand how this finding fits into the current scientific worldview." We shouldn't take the experts on blind faith, but we definitely shouldn't take the challenges on blind faith either.

michaelmrose 1y ago

It is true that revolutionary theories may be both true and controversial but they are rarely friendless or obviously wrong to nearly all practitioners of the relevant fields and those theories are legion and without merit. Without being up to date in the minutia of every field one will be ill disposed to judge which of 100 piles of nonsense extant at any given time are real discoveries and which bunkum and ones work as a journalist would be so compromised by the 1000 lies one spread that none should believe the one truth they uncovered. I wouldn't credit anyone so stupid as not to consult ones peers.