3 ms·
Maybe for dry text. Translation of art is art too and there's no such thing as higher quality art.
by GoblinSlayer 1y ago
Maybe for dry text. Translation of art is art too and there's no such thing as higher quality art.
- taneq 1y agoI’m intrigued by this statement. It seems obvious to me that some artworks are ‘higher quality’ than others. You wouldn’t, I’d presume, consider the Sistine Chapel or the Mona Lisa to be the same quality as a dickbutt scribbled on a napkin?
- Ylpertnodi 1y ago>You wouldn’t, I’d presume, consider the Sistine Chapel or the Mona Lisa to be the same quality as a dickbutt scribbled on a napkin? To paraphrase Frank Zappa...Art just needs a frame. If you poo on a table...not art. If you declare 'my poo on the table will last from the idea, until the poo dissappears', then that is art. Similarly, banksy is just graffiti unless you understand (or not) the framing of the work.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]