3 ms·
> Get users first, lock them in, fix problems later seems to be the lesson here. Or with a less cynical spin: deliver something that's useful and solves a prob
by darkwater 1y ago
> Get users first, lock them in, fix problems later seems to be the lesson here.
Or with a less cynical spin: deliver something that's useful and solves a problem for your potential users, and iterate over that without dying in the process (and Python suffered a lot already in the 2 to 3 transition)
- kubb 1y ago2 to 3 was possibly precisely because of user lock-in and sunk cost. This kind of global update was unprecedented, and could have been totally avoided with better design.
- exe34 1y ago> could have been totally avoided with better design This is why taxi drivers should run the country!
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- mixmastamyk 1y agoLaughable. Let’s see you design one of the best languages for the year 2060.