3 ms·

Thanks David. I agree with these points. Given the founder's priority is for their team, how do they effectively represent both their team's interest and the in

Thanks David. I agree with these points. Given the founder's priority is for their team, how do they effectively represent both their team's interest and the investor's interest to the acquirer? In a tight situation, who gets the preference and how much?

diego 14y ago
Why do you take it as a given that the founder's priority is the team? As a founder you have different stakeholders. Perhaps your investors have been with you for years and your team just joined, or the opposite. Like the article says, you can't generalize regarding the employees.