4 ms·
>FEMA cuts probably means these poor people will live through what Puerto Rico did when the island was wiped out years ago by that hurricane :( Why didn't a we
by HideousKojima 1y ago
>FEMA cuts probably means these poor people will live through what Puerto Rico did when the island was wiped out years ago by that hurricane :(
Why didn't a well-funded FEMA prevent what happened in Puerto Rico?
- harimau777 1y agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hurricane_Maria#Criticism_of_U.S._government_response https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hurricane_Maria#Criticism_of_U...
- HideousKojima 1y agoDoesn't cover the internal incompetence within FEMA (despite significant funding) nearly enough: https://www.npr.org/2018/07/13/628861808/fema-report-acknowledges-failures-in-puerto-rico-disaster-response https://www.npr.org/2018/07/13/628861808/fema-report-acknowl...
- viraptor 1y agohttps://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/article/fema-report-acknowledges-failures-in-puerto-rico-disaster-response/ https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/article/fema-report-ackno... has a summary
- HideousKojima 1y ago>The FEMA report found that its warehouse in Puerto Rico was nearly empty when Hurricane Maria hit last September, without cots or tarps, and very low levels of food and water, as most of the supplies had been rerouted to the U.S. Virgin Islands following Hurricane Irma. Yeah, so how did a massive agency with plenty of money (over $30 BILLION annually) not immediately begin work to restock their Puerto Rico warehouses immediately after some of the supplies were sent to help with hurricane Irma? That's roughly $1.5 million per employee of FEMA, so they should have plenty of funds after personnel costs for buying and transporting whatever emergency supplies they need.
- bernb 1y agoThat's a good point. Have you tried to get an answer to that yet? For me it works out quite often to look for a reasonable explanation when something sounds unreasonable in first sight.