3 ms·
Or if there was a law clarifying not to tread on privacy if that’s what the population has latest indicated, this kind of effort wouldn’t always need yo be wast
by j45 1y ago
Or if there was a law clarifying not to tread on privacy if that’s what the population has latest indicated, this kind of effort wouldn’t always need yo be wasted.
Asking the unpaid population to put in free labour all the time seems like a deterrent.
- hluska 1y agoDemocracy is fundamentally about putting in free labour. That’s just how it works, from the lowliest municipal elections up to federal. It’s a lot of unpaid labour. That system works and has worked for a long time.
- refactor_master 1y agoI think that’s an oversimplification. You can’t take the “free labor of performing democracy” and put it to equally good use doing anything else I can think of. I guess you could work in soup kitchens, but that’s horribly inefficient welfare compared to just electing competent leadership, if the ultimate aim is to benefit The People.
- j45 1y agoAgreed on oversimplification It’s more putting the burden on the people By free labor I meant the bureaucrats who are paid in the otherwise to make the laws
- atkailash 1y ago[dead]