3 ms·
> is there still a valid, public-interest reason to avoid fragmented AI regulation? I don't see why there would be any more pressing reasons than for other fie
by xg15 1y ago
> is there still a valid, public-interest reason to avoid fragmented AI regulation?
I don't see why there would be any more pressing reasons than for other fields, say climate or energy regulation (looking at you, Texas) or of course the classic: personal choices of sexuality and reproduction. Yet no one is trying to ban state laws there, on the contrary.
- firesteelrain 1y agoThat’s because it’s about preempting progressive governance in places like California, New York, or Illinois
- xg15 1y agoAnd that's a valid reason?
- firesteelrain 1y agoSure for the GOP it is just like Democrats do the same to Conservatives. GOP is in power and they are setting the policy now.
- xg15 1y agoOK, that may be a "valid" reason in the realm of power politics and partisan warfare, but it's definitely not "public-interest".
- firesteelrain 1y agoIt depends who you talk to. When Democrats enact policy they certainly think it’s in the public interest and conversely so do Republicans. It goes both ways