3 ms·
This is actually an in-depth analysis on the fraudulent paper and it's much more interesting than the WSJ article. One for dang to decide I guess.
by pera 1y ago
This is actually an in-depth analysis on the fraudulent paper and it's much more interesting than the WSJ article. One for dang to decide I guess.
- ChrisArchitect 1y agoAnd it's shared there adding to large discussion. The discussion is over there.