So, just to be perfectly clear: are you advocating that there should be no cap in the contributions to Social Security, while the cap on the benefits should sta

So, just to be perfectly clear: are you advocating that there should be no cap in the contributions to Social Security, while the cap on the benefits should stay in place? And the argument is that if you are rich you can afford it. But why increase the tax on the rich in an obfuscated way via this Social Security trick? Because you think they won't notice it? Or because you think you can stoke some proletariat fury by claiming that the cap is injust? It's ok to stoke that fury if the injustice is there, but in this case it is not.