3 ms·
Given that this post is a response to an article about achieving the same in "N lines of Go" (also using a library), it seems like an appropriate title.
by monooso 1y ago
Given that this post is a response to an article about achieving the same in "N lines of Go" (also using a library), it seems like an appropriate title.
- johnisgood 1y agoThe original post uses "github.com/anthropics/anthropic-sdk-go", the Ruby uses a different library, does it not? If they are two different libraries, then the comparison does not make too much sense.
- radanskoric 1y agoI didn't put the number into the title to make it a competition. LoC is a poor metric. I put it to communicate to the reader that they won't have to spend a lot of time reading the article to get a full understanding. I always put extra effort into trying to make my blog posts shorter without sacrificing the quality. I think good technical writing should transfer the knowledge while requesting the least amount of time possible from the reader.
- johnisgood 1y agoI know, I was only responding to the comment, I was not trying to claim that you are attempting to make it a competition, my bad if it came across as such.
- radanskoric 1y agoIt's good that you commented. I see more than a few people are getting caught up on the number of lines so it's good that I clarify.
- monooso 1y agoI simply meant that I don't consider the title misleading; it's in keeping with the format of the original title and both solutions use third-party libraries to communicate with the external service.
- johnisgood 1y agoFair enough. :)