4 ms·
Which is a very reasonable conclusion given the kinds of errors it makes. Why are you so defensive about the tech? Involved in any AI startups, perhaps?
by codr7 1y ago
Which is a very reasonable conclusion given the kinds of errors it makes.
Why are you so defensive about the tech?
Involved in any AI startups, perhaps?
- rvz 1y agoMost of them are involved (including the latest round of YC startups), who have VCs invested in them to boost "AI agents" all over the internet and ignoring the laughable errors it makes. Here are some headlines: OpenAI explains why ChatGPT became too sycophantic [0] Anthropic blames Claude AI for ‘embarrassing and unintentional mistake’ in legal filing [1] xAI blames Grok’s obsession with white genocide on an ‘unauthorized modification’ [2] So you see, these AI models can easily be prone to producing nonsensical errors unpredictably at any time. [0] https://techcrunch.com/2025/04/29/openai-explains-why-chatgpt-became-too-sycophantic https://techcrunch.com/2025/04/29/openai-explains-why-chatgp... [1] https://www.theverge.com/news/668315/anthropic-claude-legal-filing-citation-error https://www.theverge.com/news/668315/anthropic-claude-legal-... [2] https://techcrunch.com/2025/05/15/xai-blames-groks-obsession-with-white-genocide-on-an-unauthorized-modification/ https://techcrunch.com/2025/05/15/xai-blames-groks-obsession...
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]