The problem is that, knowing the public internet, what would absolutely happen, is people arguing the ways in which a) the code is bad b) the problem is beneat

The problem is that, knowing the public internet, what would absolutely happen, is people arguing the ways in which a) the code is bad b) the problem is beneath what they consider non-trivial The way that OP structured the response, I frankly got a similar impression (although the follow up feels much different). I just don't see the point in engaging in that here, but I take your criticism: Why engage at all. I should probably not, then.