4 ms·
You're the one doing the gaslighting now. "It doesn't work for me, therefore it can't possibly work for anyone else."
by Kiro 1y ago
You're the one doing the gaslighting now. "It doesn't work for me, therefore it can't possibly work for anyone else."
- codr7 1y agoWhich is a very reasonable conclusion given the kinds of errors it makes. Why are you so defensive about the tech? Involved in any AI startups, perhaps?
- rvz 1y agoMost of them are involved (including the latest round of YC startups), who have VCs invested in them to boost "AI agents" all over the internet and ignoring the laughable errors it makes. Here are some headlines: OpenAI explains why ChatGPT became too sycophantic [0] Anthropic blames Claude AI for ‘embarrassing and unintentional mistake’ in legal filing [1] xAI blames Grok’s obsession with white genocide on an ‘unauthorized modification’ [2] So you see, these AI models can easily be prone to producing nonsensical errors unpredictably at any time. [0] https://techcrunch.com/2025/04/29/openai-explains-why-chatgpt-became-too-sycophantic https://techcrunch.com/2025/04/29/openai-explains-why-chatgp... [1] https://www.theverge.com/news/668315/anthropic-claude-legal-filing-citation-error https://www.theverge.com/news/668315/anthropic-claude-legal-... [2] https://techcrunch.com/2025/05/15/xai-blames-groks-obsession-with-white-genocide-on-an-unauthorized-modification/ https://techcrunch.com/2025/05/15/xai-blames-groks-obsession...
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- raincole 1y agoAt this point you should just take this as your secret weapon. Let people convince each other that AI can't do that thing, while you are one-shotting the exact thing with a cost of $0.05.