3 ms·

O3s story is not amazing but it sure is orders of magnitude more interesting than your example: https://chatgpt.com/share/68282eb2-e53c-8000-853f-9a03eee128fc

O3s story is not amazing but it sure is orders of magnitude more interesting than your example: https://chatgpt.com/share/68282eb2-e53c-8000-853f-9a03eee128fc https://chatgpt.com/share/68282eb2-e53c-8000-853f-9a03eee128... I don't think it's possible to generate an acceptable story without reasoning. That is not to say that I disagree with you. I would prefer to read human authors even if the AI was great at writing stories, because there's something alluring about getting a glimpse into a world that somebody else created in their head.

randcraw 1y ago
> I don't think it's possible to generate an acceptable story without reasoning. If I look back at any article, book, movie, or conversation that I liked, it always had this essential ingredient: it had to make sense, AND it had to introduce some novel fact (or idea) that led to implications that were entertaining somehow (intriguing, revelatory, amusing, etc). Would this be possible without the author having some idea of how reasoning works? Or of what facts are novel or could lead to surprise of some kind? No is the obvious answer to both. Until I see clear evidence that LLMs have mastered both logic and the concept of what knowledge is and is not intriguing to a human, I foresee little creative output from any LLM that will 'move the needle' creatively. Until then, LLM-generated fare will remain the uninspired factory produce of infinite monkeys and typewriters...