4 ms·
It's not the fastest on smhasher anymore. umash is better and faster, and gxhash is twice as fast. It's is however very hashmap friendly because of its small si
by rurban 1y ago
It's not the fastest on smhasher anymore. umash is better and faster, and gxhash is twice as fast. It's is however very hashmap friendly because of its small size. It's a wyhash variant
- nicoshev11 1y agoHey Reini, the rapidhash version on the SMHasher repo is outdated. The latest version was published last Tuesday, I'll submit it to SMHasher shortly. This new version is much faster than the previous one, and still passes all tests. It should beat umash on your benchmarks.
- Sesse__ 1y agoAm I right in that RAPIDHASH_UNROLLED is now mandatory and the function is thus much larger now?