4 ms·
I'm trying to read the paper https://arxiv.org/pdf/2405.10732 https://arxiv.org/pdf/2405.10732 to get a sense of things in more detail (probably quite helplessl
by schuyler2d 1y ago
I'm trying to read the paper
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2405.10732 https://arxiv.org/pdf/2405.10732
to get a sense of things in more detail (probably quite helplessly).
It's talking about ellipticity. Should I be imagining a kind of tightly packed set of ellipses at all scales and shapes (kind of undulating or expanding and collapsing I guess)?
Does anyone have a better gloss-level sense of "the new method"?
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- red_trumpet 1y agoI'd guess the term "elliptic" has more to do with elliptic operators[1] than with ellipses. Of course, ultimately elliptic operators are named after ellipses, but the association is not as direct as you might imagine[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elliptic_operator https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elliptic_operator [2] https://mathoverflow.net/a/359723/111897 https://mathoverflow.net/a/359723/111897