> What makes something a good potential tool, if the shell command can (technically) can do anything - like running tests? Think of it as -semantic- wrappers s

> What makes something a good potential tool, if the shell command can (technically) can do anything - like running tests? Think of it as -semantic- wrappers so the LLM can -decide- what action to take at any given moment given its context, the user prompt, and available tools names and descriptions. creating wrappers for the most used basic tools even if they all pipe to terminal unix commands can be useful. also giving it speicif knowledge base it can consult on demand like a wiki of its own stack etc