You originally asked about exclusion (and I tried and think I did answer it), and I appreciate the follow-up. But NEAA doesn’t shut anyone out. It doesn’t regul

You originally asked about exclusion (and I tried and think I did answer it), and I appreciate the follow-up. But NEAA doesn’t shut anyone out. It doesn’t regulate belief or speech—it gives the public a tool to see who has voluntarily agreed to ethical standards. Ethics, like fairness, are shaped by consensus and context. NEAA just formalizes that into something public, transparent, and usable. People can still decide for themselves who to trust. This just gives them a way to make that decision informed, not blind. And Nixon’s claim that criticism was unethical wasn’t about standards—it was about shielding power. NEAA isn’t about limiting scrutiny. It’s about making public who holds themselves to verifiable standards of transparency and integrity.