6 ms·

Unauthorized aka Elon got backend root and made some changes to help his rw narrative.

• EasyMark 1y ago
  As in "if y'all say I did this, I know the President and DHS Secretary -very- well"?
• ninetyninenine 1y ago
  A lot of people working for Elon hate him. So I’m sure some employee just did this before he quit.
  • hersko 1y ago
    Nah, if it was an employee who quit they would say that. The fact that they didn't mention firing the employee who did it means either: 1 - It was some super valuable 10x guy 2 - (more likely) it was Elon Musk
    • FirmwareBurner 1y ago
      Did Apple mention firing the dev(s) who had voice to text replace "Trump" with "Racist" in iOS?[1] Did Google mention firing the dev(s) who blocked Gemini from generating photos of white people?[2] Most likely no people were fired in either of such cases because they were only following orders from above congruent to the company's internal political and cultural biases, or if they were acting rogue, they got hefty severance packages in exchanged for signing NDAs not to talk to the press about the toxic and possibly illegal things going on inside the company. But either way, no company wants to publicly talk about firing rogue workers since its bad press no matter how you slice it, plus its an admission of guilt of company's culture being rotten or even illegal behind the scenes. They just deny and call it a bug then stay quiet while changing things behind the scene till people forget about it. [1] https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/25/technology/iphone-dictation-trump-racist.html https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/25/technology/iphone-dictati... [2] https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/etimes/trending/googles-ai-gemini-faces-backlash-for-failing-to-generate-images-of-white-people/articleshow/107940178.cms https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/etimes/trending/googles-...
      • miltonlost 1y ago
        Those companies are not owned by a manbaby who called a stranger a Pedo Guy and who has doxxed multiple others. Twitter and Musk would, in a heartbeat, name whoever did this, if it hadn't been Musk himself. You need to remember that Musk is exceptionally petty.
        • FirmwareBurner 1y ago
          You're ignoring the core issue these companies have, and applying double standards.
          • lesuorac 1y ago
            It's not a double standard. Musk has a history of doxxing. Pichai/Cook does not have a history of doxxing. Ergo, we would expect Musk to doxx somebody given the opportunity while we would not expect the same of Pichai/Cook. The standard being, somebody who likes to doxx will doxx.
            • FirmwareBurner 1y ago
              [flagged]
          • deleted 1y ago
            [deleted]
      • insane_dreamer 1y ago
        1. Google didn't claim it was some rogue employee. It was a flaw in their model weights (they'd had others before). 2. Apple's case is more similar, but their dictation feature is not a core product in the way that xAI's chat bot is. In other words, you'd expect more checks to ensure that something like your system prompt can't just be modified by some employee (on purpose or inadvertently).
        • FirmwareBurner 1y ago
    • rickydroll 1y ago
      3 - was transferred to doge
      • ethbr1 1y ago
        4 - twitter's change control systems are so screwed up after Musk fired a chunk of the company that there was no audit trail identifying who did this
        • SEJeff 1y ago
          By design. This is a feature, not a bug.
• soraminazuki 1y ago
  [flagged]