Over the past few months, I have read numerous articles on this topic. Some are in favor, some are against, and others fall somewhere in between. However, they

Over the past few months, I have read numerous articles on this topic. Some are in favor, some are against, and others fall somewhere in between. However, they all share a common shortcoming: the absence of code. There are no codebases, no commit histories—nothing that allows readers to track how the codebase evolves, gets refactored, or how new features are integrated. Without access to the code, it's challenging to verify the authors' claims and form an independent opinion. In my view, we should be cautious about trusting articles that lack examples or sources. As someone wiser than me once said: > Articles without sources are merely the opinions of the author.