> An argument against it is that there are clearly people driven by the desire for "more", with no visible upper bound. At the moment it's unknown whether it's

> An argument against it is that there are clearly people driven by the desire for "more", with no visible upper bound. At the moment it's unknown whether it's a normal function of the system or a result of miscalibration/malfunction (assuming the theory is correct). Existence of these people is only an evidence for the capacity of the system, not a description of the nominal function.