4 ms·
If it's so easy to fire people with no consequences, how do you explain the reticence of companies to take some risks in hiring.
by FirmwareBurner 1y ago
If it's so easy to fire people with no consequences, how do you explain the reticence of companies to take some risks in hiring.
- const_cast 1y agoCompanies are risk-averse to a detriment. If you look at huge companies who have failed over time you'll notice something: they have the tools, but they don't have the balls. Companies are pretty much always going to prioritize the lowest-risk highest-value option right now, over and over and over, until they eventually fail. This doesn't just pertain to hiring, but all business decisions. RCA, GE, GM, you name it, this is how it's done. It's the American school of business.