3 ms·
I used to run this, but once systems started having 20 cpu cores, and 12 hard drives, it wouldn't fit on the screen anymore... sadly conky has the same issue.
by nubinetwork 1y ago
I used to run this, but once systems started having 20 cpu cores, and 12 hard drives, it wouldn't fit on the screen anymore... sadly conky has the same issue.
- switchbak 1y agoI think perhaps I’m old school, but I’ve been using xosview with a patch that shows ccx utilization (on AMD) instead of per core. Treats me pretty well, but it’s a very unloved project.
- funcDropShadow 1y agoDo you have a link to that patched version?
- Deeg9rie9usi 1y agoJust scale down the chart size. For my 16 core system each CPU chart is just 5px high, it works great because you still have the horizontal indicators.
- flyinghamster 1y agoIf I have more than 8 threads, I'll use the composite CPU chart instead. Also, I have to tell it to ignore veth, vnet, and virbr network interfaces, since I run virt-manager on the box as well.
- bityard 1y agoYou can pick and choose which devices are important to monitor, and you can combine all the CPU cores into one chart. That's what I do anyway.